Aldnoah.Zero: it finally clicks
March 9, 2015 27 Comments
One thing that has bothered me about Aldnoah.Zero since episode 12 aired back in September last year was this question:
Why did Slaine shoot Inaho?
I get the feeling that most people decided pretty quickly what they thought—it can be summed up in just three letters: NTR. But that explanation, popular especially amongst viewers that really dislike Slaine, always bothered me, particularly after what Aoki (or one of the other creators) apparently said at a Machi Asobi in Tokushima talk event on October 12, 2014:
Ａ 1クールではあんまり描いてないけど、2クールを見てもらったら「嫉妬」ではなく「別の目的」があるこ とがわかる。12話でスレインが立ち去った時、一体どこへ歩いて行ったのか、がヒントらしい
Q: Was Slaine in love with the princess? At the end of ep 12, it seemed like he was jealous…
A: It wasn’t really depicted in the first cour, but if you watch the second cour, you’ll realise that it wasn’t jealousy, but something else. Where Slaine departs to in episode 12, where he is heading when he walks off, is a hint.
(first translated here)
At the time, the following explanation made the most sense to me:
Shipping stuff aside, I think there’s a good case for Slaine being motivated by jealousy when he stopped Inaho. I think initially he really did think the other was just using the princess but once he saw him crawling towards Seylum he realized it was more than that. This guy was fulfilling the role he always wanted for himself. To be the princess’ knight. And more importantly had succeeded until Slaine’s misguided actions. I think the dissonance between what Slaine wanted to be and what he actually ended up being was the straw that broke the camel’s back. So he lashed out.
|Hm…no, there is a key difference here…|
But after reading what Aoki had said, I realised that something wasn’t quite right with the ‘jealousy’ theory outlined above, namely “He lashed out.” If you watch the scene again carefully, whilst Slaine shot at Saazbuam haphazardly, as you might expect someone lashing out to do, he was in full control of himself when he turned his gun on Inaho. In other words, Slaine had decided what he needed to do at that point, and took his course of action based on that.
(Setting off some of the most ridiculous forum debates I’ve seen in years in the process…but I digress.)
Slaine ‘On War’
Now that Slaine has revealed his objective in episode 21, it finally all makes sense to me.
Following on from this, the reason that Slaine shot Inaho was simply that he was an adversary who would have refused to be assimilated; what he said to Inaho was probably just to provide a pretext to shoot him. Some would argue that Slaine could have joined the Earth side. However, he’d probably calculated that the Aldnoah power would give him the best chance of achieving his objective of creating a lasting peace, especially since he was in a position where he could bargain with Saazbaum. He probably also believed that his best chance of saving Asseylum lay with the medical facilities of Vers rather than those on Earth. Hence, the Faustian bargain with Saazbaum. Slaine might be in love with Asseylum—I’m ambivalent on this issue, personally—but whether he is or not doesn’t matter: what has driven the choices he’s made since episode 12 are largely his beliefs about the causes of war.
Inaho ‘On War’
Aoki’s other comment, that “it wasn’t really depicted in the first cour,” was also true. This theme of “what causes conflict, and thus how do we stop/prevent it” was touched on because it was always Asseylum’s primary objective, but only intermittently, most notably in episode 12:
Clausewitz ‘On War’
Inaho was referencing Carl von Clausewitz’s most famous aphorism, from his treatise On War: “War is the continuation of politics by other means.” However, it should be noted that that wasn’t actually Clausewitz’s bottom line. Rather, as noted by a number of scholars, this was one of the several definitions of war that he considered on the way to synthesising his famous “trinity”:
War is “a fascinating trinity—composed of primordial violence, hatred, and enmity, which are to be regarded as a blind natural force; the play of chance and probability, within which the creative spirit is free to roam; and its element of subordination, as an instrument of policy, which makes it subject to pure reason.”
Or to summarise: violent emotion/chance/rational calculation. Come to think of it, isn’t this actually represented in the show? Rational calculation is obviously Inaho; violent emotion is the cause for conflict given by Asseylum (it could also be allocated to Slaine for the impetus behind some of his actions in the first cour, but since that’s changed now, I think this fits better); and chance is what has plagued Slaine over the entire war. Alternatively, reading into the detail of what Clausewitz wrote, Inaho represents chance because his plays against the Vers knights are about all about creative tactics that are also dependent on chance and probability, whilst Slaine represents rational calculation since he is now using war as an instrument of policy in order to achieve his objective.
Hm…since he’s the one credited for the overall story, I’d dearly love to have the opportunity to speak to Urobuchi Gen about this…! And do excuse me for nerding out: this kind of stuff is quite literally what I do for a living at present. (^^;;)
p.s. I can’t for the life of me remember what I thought the theme of Aldnoah.Zero was before I changed my mind about five weeks ago, after reading through a glut of interviews. The theme I was considering after the change, however, was something along the lines of “Why do we shoot at our own (people)?” which is slightly off…
p.p.s. I’m not ignoring the moral debate that is inherent in what Slaine is doing – I do talk about it a little in my weekly livejournal posts. I also intend to do a post about it at some stage, though it might have to be after the show is finished, as I’m still waiting on one final piece of the puzzle: exactly what Slaine intends to do with Aldnoah…
edit (2015-06-02): I found out recently that there’s a slight mistranslation in the English version of what Clausewitz wrote in German. The sentence is actually “War is the continuation of politics with other means.” The word ‘with’ conveys much more clearly how war is just another tool in the political toolkit, rather than a red line that leaders would not want to cross. For what it’s worth, the line of dialogue that they gave Inaho in Japanese actually does convey that.